From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: OCFS2 mainline state? Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:16:18 +0000 Message-ID: <20130225211617.GF4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <512BCA9E.4090702@nod.at> <20130225211103.GA13510@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Richard Weinberger , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, ocfs2-user@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, david@sigma-star.at To: Mark Fasheh Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130225211103.GA13510@wotan.suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote: > I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline > already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the > patches for us right now). > > I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today. Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus... Or I can pick that patch via VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow). There also had been Jan's ocfs2 patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees. Should I just pick the ocfs2 stuff from now on?