From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][ATTEND] Improving async io, specifically
 io_submit latencies
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:31:21 -0800
Message-ID: <20130301163121.GB2481@mtj.dyndns.org>
References: <512FB91B.80102@suse.de>
 <20130228210318.GA3762@google.com>
 <x49k3pr2mcs.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
 <20130301162038.GA2481@mtj.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>,
	Ankit Jain <jankit@suse.de>, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>, tytso@mit.edu,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:51972 "EHLO
	mail-qa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751058Ab3CAQbe (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:31:34 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130301162038.GA2481@mtj.dyndns.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:20:38AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> One obstacle there is we currently don't have a way to say "this
> workqueue belongs to this cgroup" as there is no "this" cgroup defined
> (awesome design).  That part is being rectified but for the time being
> we can probably say "this workqueue belongs to the same cgroups as
> %current" which should be enough for aio contexts, I think.

Or maybe we should just add current->wq which always matches cgroup
associations of the task?

-- 
tejun