From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not check ocfs2 Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:09:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20130304230922.20f6c05a@spider.haslach.nod.at> References: <1362269150-21478-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <20130303011917.GI23616@dastard> <20130303100254.500b076f@spider.haslach.nod.at> <5133C900.9050300@sandeen.net> <20130303231905.0efd6d08@spider.haslach.nod.at> <5133D15A.9010600@sandeen.net> <20130303235341.7470085e@spider.haslach.nod.at> <5133D573.3050106@sandeen.net> <20130304004229.GK23616@dastard> <20130304210522.GA7783@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Chinner , Eric Sandeen , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Joel Becker Return-path: Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:47834 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932305Ab3CDWJ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:09:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130304210522.GA7783@localhost> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:05:23 -0800 schrieb Joel Becker : > > Really, xfstests is not designed for testing cluster filesystems in > > clustered environments. If we really want to support clustered > > filesystems and cluster wide operations, then we need to think > > about how to architect multi-host support into xfstests sanely. > > Clustered filesystems are not the only people that could make use of > > such functionality (NFS and CIFS come to mind).... ;) > > I'm much happier with the "check for other cluster mounts" approach > rather than avoiding fsck entirely. We like xfstests in the local or > single-node cases to behave exactly as one would expect. > > We do run xfstests on multiple nodes in a cluster, but by hand and > with our own cleanup. Obviously support for automating that would be > awesome :-) Can you share your cleanup code? Thanks, //richard