From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: fix sparse error on RCU assignment
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:23:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130310182358.GA686@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130310113559.GA16551@dcvr.yhbt.net>
On 03/10, Eric Wong wrote:
>
> This fixes the following sparse error when using
> CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER=y and "make C=2 fs/eventpoll.o"
>
> fs/eventpoll.c:514:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
ep_remove_wait_queue() does rcu_dereference(pwq->whead) and
rcu_dereference_sparse(__rcu) complains, I guess.
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct eppoll_entry {
> wait_queue_t wait;
>
> /* The wait queue head that linked the "wait" wait queue item */
> - wait_queue_head_t *whead;
> + wait_queue_head_t __rcu *whead;
Well, perhaps this change is fine... but otoh this this a bit misleading.
It is not actually __rcu. The special case is sighand->signalfd_wqh, and
the commemt in ep_remove_wait_queue() means: if ->whead is not stable then
we can only race with signalfd_cleanup(), and rcu_read_lock() ensures this
memory can't go away.
We do not even need smp_read_barrier_depends() here, ACCESS_ONCE() should
be enough.
Perhaps it would be better to simply shut up this warning somehow...
> };
>
> /* Wrapper struct used by poll queueing */
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *k
> struct eventpoll *ep = epi->ep;
>
> if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) {
> - ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead = NULL;
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead, NULL);
> /*
> * whead = NULL above can race with ep_remove_wait_queue()
> * which can do another remove_wait_queue() after us, so we
> @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ static void ep_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *whead,
>
> if (epi->nwait >= 0 && (pwq = kmem_cache_alloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL))) {
> init_waitqueue_func_entry(&pwq->wait, ep_poll_callback);
> - pwq->whead = whead;
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(pwq->whead, whead);
> pwq->base = epi;
> add_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
> list_add_tail(&pwq->llink, &epi->pwqlist);
> --
> Eric Wong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-10 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-10 11:35 [PATCH] epoll: fix sparse error on RCU assignment Eric Wong
2013-03-10 18:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-03-14 2:45 ` Eric Wong
2013-03-15 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-28 19:34 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130310182358.GA686@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).