From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Serge Hallyn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] memcg-aware slab shrinking Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 07:38:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20130401123843.GC5217@sergelap> References: <1364548450-28254-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, hughd@google.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Dave Shrinnker , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton To: Glauber Costa Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1364548450-28254-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Quoting Glauber Costa (glommer@parallels.com): > Hi, > > Notes: > ====== > > This is v2 of memcg-aware LRU shrinking. I've been testing it extensively > and it behaves well, at least from the isolation point of view. However, > I feel some more testing is needed before we commit to it. Still, this is > doing the job fairly well. Comments welcome. Do you have any performance tests (preferably with enough runs with and without this patchset to show 95% confidence interval) to show the impact this has? Certainly the feature sounds worthwhile, but I'm curious about the cost of maintaining this extra state. -serge -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org