From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] jbd2: Fix block tag checksum verification brokenness
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:40:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130604004015.GA6087@blackbox.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130603075521.GA6088@blackbox.djwong.org>
[adding tytso and linux-ext4 to cc]
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:55:21AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 10:16:30PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> > > Fortunately metadata checksumming is still "experimental" and not in a shipping
> > > e2fsprogs, so there should be few users affected by this.
> >
> > Am I reading this patch correctly that this changes which half of
> > the 32-bit checksum is stored on little-endian (e.g. x86) machines?
> > Before, it stored the low 16 bits of cpu_to_be32(csum), meaning the
> > high 16 bits of csum.
>
> ...unless you're using a BE system in which case it's the low 16 bits. :)
>
> > Now, it's cpu_to_be16(csum32), which is the low 16 bits of csum32.
> >
> > It so happens that I have multiple metadata_csum file systems.
> > (I enabled it a while ago on a machine where I wasn't sure if corruption
> > was RAM or disk, and have been using it on SSE4.2 machines since.)
> >
> > Is there an upgrade path? Also, what's the corresponding e2fsprogs
> > commit that supports this change?
>
> The kernel patch fixes journal bogosity when moving a disk between big and
> little endian systems. e2fsprogs didn't have the brokenness, so there's no
Drat, I was writing this email too late at night. There /is/ a related
e2fsprogs patch for this:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/38621
Hey Ted, any thoughts on this jbd2/e2fsprogs patch pair? Al acked the jbd2
part.
--D
> change needed. In theory you'd only hit this if you happened to crash an x86
> box with an ext4 fs, move the disk to a ppc, and try to recover it there.
>
> The upgrade path is to umount cleanly and reboot with a patched kernel while
> hoping that you don't crash while rebooting. Sorry about the bumpy
> metadata_csum ride.
>
> --D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-04 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-03 2:16 [PATCH v3] jbd2: Fix block tag checksum verification brokenness George Spelvin
2013-06-03 7:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-06-04 0:40 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2013-06-04 3:32 ` George Spelvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-10 23:38 [PATCH v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2013-05-11 5:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-05-13 21:47 ` [PATCH v3] " Darrick J. Wong
2013-05-28 11:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130604004015.GA6087@blackbox.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).