From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 22/35] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:41:16 +1000 Message-ID: <20130606034116.GT29338@dastard> References: <1370287804-3481-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> <1370287804-3481-23-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> <20130605160821.59adf9ad4efe48144fd9e237@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Glauber Costa , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mel Gorman , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Greg Thelen , Dave Chinner , Marcelo Tosatti , Gleb Natapov , Chuck Lever , "J. Bruce Fields" , Trond Myklebust To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130605160821.59adf9ad4efe48144fd9e237-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:08:21PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:29:51 +0400 Glauber Costa wrote: > > > From: Dave Chinner > > > > Convert the remaining couple of random shrinkers in the tree to the > > new API. > > Gee we have a lot of shrinkers. And a large number of them are busted in some way, too :/ > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > > @@ -4213,13 +4213,14 @@ restart: > > spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock); > > } > > > > -static int mmu_shrink(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc) > > +static long > > +mmu_shrink_scan( > > + struct shrinker *shrink, > > + struct shrink_control *sc) > > > > ... > > > > --- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c > > -static int > > -rpcauth_cache_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc) > > +static long > > +rpcauth_cache_shrink_scan( > > + struct shrinker *shrink, > > + struct shrink_control *sc) > > + > > It is pretty poor form to switch other people's code into this very > non-standard XFSish coding style. The maintainers are just going to > have to go wtf and switch it back one day. My bad. That's left over from when I was originally developing the the patch set passed a couple more parameters to the shrinkers pushing every single declaration to well over the line length limits. I never converted them back as I removed the extra parameters, because it's far easier to just have delete a line that delete a variable and reformat the entire function declaration.... > Really, it would be best if you were to go through the entire patchset > and undo all this. Sure, that can be done. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org