From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize wait_sb_inodes()
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:45:21 -0400
Message-ID: <20130627234521.GC22832@thunk.org>
References: <20130626231143.GC28426@dastard>
 <87wqpg76ls.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
 <20130627044705.GB29790@dastard>
 <87y59w5dye.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
 <20130627063816.GD29790@dastard>
 <87ppv83tnn.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
 <20130627094042.GZ29338@dastard>
 <87mwqb3m1e.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
 <20130627183631.GB22832@thunk.org>
 <871u7nrupn.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	tux3@tux3.org
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871u7nrupn.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 08:37:40AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> 
> Well, anyway, it is simple. This issue was came as the performance
> regression when I was experimenting to use kernel bdi flusher from own
> flusher. The issue was sync(2) like I said.  And this was just I
> couldn't solve this issue by tux3 side unlike other optimizations.

A performance regression using fsstress?  That's not a program
intended to be a useful benchmark for measuring performance.

	       	 		      - Ted