From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of
 list_for_each()
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:06:06 +0300
Message-ID: <20130729080606.GD5053@mwanda>
References: <1374931429-14062-1-git-send-email-yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
 <20130729074928.GB5053@mwanda>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: mfasheh@suse.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	jeff.liu@oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	sunil.mushran@gmail.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
	xuejiufei@huawei.com, shencanquan@huawei.com,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130729074928.GB5053@mwanda>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Oh.  It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2.  Only the CC
list.

It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing
for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his
patch was dropped.

Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the
message every single time.

regards,
dan carpenter