From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking rename_lock Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:05:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20130906210546.GW13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1378483738-10129-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1378483738-10129-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Waiman Long , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" , "Norton, Scott J" , George Spelvin , John Stoffel To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 01:52:49PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Al - do you have comments? Do you want to take this through your tree, > or are you working on other things? I can take this directly too.. I can take that, but I'm really not convinced that we need writer lock there at all. After all, if we really can get livelocks on that one, we would be getting them on d_lookup()... Let's not complicate the things without need; if we ever run into loads where livelock start to happen, we can look into dealing with them.