linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, matthew.garrett@nebula.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mount: Add a flag to not follow symlink at the end of mount point
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 17:35:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130909213526.GB2799@redhat.com> (raw)

I have a requirement where I want to make sure that mount() fails if
mount point is a symlink. Hence introducing a new mount flag MS_NOSYMLINK.

Following is little more info on what I am trying to do. I am trying
to write patches for signed /sbin/kexec. That is /sbin/kexec binary will
be signed and in secureboot environment kernel will verify signature 
of /sbin/kexec and upon successful verfication, /sbin/kexec will be
trusted and allowed to load new kernel.

/sbin/kexec gathers bunch of data from /sys and /proc. Given the fact that
only /sbin/kexec is trusted and not other root processes, one need to make
sure that a root process can not alter /sys or /proc to fool /sbin/kexec.

So requirement is that /sbin/kexec needs to make sure that it is
looking at /proc and /sys as exported by kernel (and not an artificial
view possibly created by a root process).

Eric Biederman suggested that use per process mount name space functionality.
/sbin/kexec runs as root. So create separate mount namespace. Make it
recursively private to disable any event propogation. Unmount existing
/proc and /sys and remount them.

Actual code of what I am trying to do in kexec-tools is posted here.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2013-September/004463.html

Al Viro mentioned that one needs to make sure /proc and /sys are not symlinks.
Otherwise after remounting, root could remove symlinks and create /proc and
/sys with its own files.

And there comes the need to make sure mount point is not a symlink
and hence this patch.

I did basic testing by doing following and it seems to work.

syscall(__NR_mount, "none", <mount-point>, "proc", 1<<25,"");

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 fs/namespace.c          |    6 +++++-
 include/uapi/linux/fs.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/uapi/linux/fs.h	2013-05-03 22:05:19.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/include/uapi/linux/fs.h	2013-09-10 04:42:08.372708254 -0400
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
 #define MS_KERNMOUNT	(1<<22) /* this is a kern_mount call */
 #define MS_I_VERSION	(1<<23) /* Update inode I_version field */
 #define MS_STRICTATIME	(1<<24) /* Always perform atime updates */
+#define MS_NOSYMLINK	(1<<25) /* Do not follow symlink at the end */
 
 /* These sb flags are internal to the kernel */
 #define MS_NOSEC	(1<<28)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/namespace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/namespace.c	2013-09-09 21:50:45.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/fs/namespace.c	2013-09-10 04:40:26.477709733 -0400
@@ -2323,7 +2323,11 @@ long do_mount(const char *dev_name, cons
 		((char *)data_page)[PAGE_SIZE - 1] = 0;
 
 	/* ... and get the mountpoint */
-	retval = kern_path(dir_name, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &path);
+	if (flags & MS_NOSYMLINK)
+		retval = kern_path(dir_name, 0, &path);
+	else
+		retval = kern_path(dir_name, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &path);
+
 	if (retval)
 		return retval;
 

                 reply	other threads:[~2013-09-09 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130909213526.GB2799@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).