linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
To: "Jeff Moyer" <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Auto stop async-write on block device when device removed.
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:07:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309241107330800706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x49r4cfy4py.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com

>majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> For async-write on block device,if device removed,but the vfs don't know it.
>> It will continue to do.
>> Patch1 set size of inode of block device to zero when removed disk.By this,vfs know 
>> disk changed.
>> Path2 add size-check on blk_aio_write.If pos of write larger than size of inode,it will
>> return zero.So the user can check disk state.
>
>OK, so the basic problem is that __generic_file_aio_write will always
>return 0 after device removal, yes?  I'm not sure why that's a real
>issue, can you explain exactly why you're trying to change this?
>
At prenset, the __generic_file_aio_write don't return zero rather that the wanted size.
So the user can't know the disk removed. 
For example:
dd if=/dev/zero of=usb-disk bs=64k
When removed usb-disk, dd stoped until reached the endof usb-disk.

Using this patch, after removed disk, the aio-write will return zero.I think the upper user will check.
(or if the size of block is zero, we return -ENOSPC).

>As for your patches, I don't think that putting the i_size_write into
>invalidate_partitions is a good idea.  Consider the case of rescanning
>partitions: you will always detect a size change now, which is not good.
>
Yes.But in func rescan_partitions, after invalidate_partitions it will call check_disk_size_change to set size of block_device.

Thanks!
Jianpeng Ma
>Cheers,
>Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-24  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-17  3:21 [PATCH V2 0/2] Auto stop async-write on block device when device removed majianpeng
2013-09-23 14:47 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-09-24  3:07   ` majianpeng [this message]
2013-09-24 13:54     ` Jeff Moyer
2013-09-25  1:32       ` majianpeng
2013-09-25 15:44         ` Jeff Moyer
2013-09-29  8:46       ` majianpeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201309241107330800706@gmail.com \
    --to=majianpeng@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).