From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
aswin@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,fs: introduce helpers around i_mmap_mutex
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:58:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131003135822.e0b2ca10fe5a460714bb82a3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380745066-9925-2-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com>
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:17:45 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> wrote:
> Various parts of the kernel acquire and release this mutex,
> so add i_mmap_lock_write() and immap_unlock_write() helper
> functions that will encapsulate this logic. The next patch
> will make use of these.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -478,6 +478,16 @@ struct block_device {
>
> int mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, int tag);
>
> +static inline void i_mmap_lock_write(struct address_space *mapping)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> +}
I don't understand the thinking behind the "_write". There is no
"_read" and all callsites use "_write", so why not call it
i_mmap_lock()?
I *assume* the answer is "so we can later convert some sites to a new
i_mmap_lock_read()". If so, the changelog should have discussed this.
If not, still confused.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 20:17 [PATCH 0/2] fs,mm: abstract i_mmap_mutex lock Davidlohr Bueso
2013-10-02 20:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm,fs: introduce helpers around i_mmap_mutex Davidlohr Bueso
2013-10-03 20:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-10-03 21:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-10-04 1:28 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-10-02 20:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs,mm: use new helper functions around the i_mmap_mutex Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131003135822.e0b2ca10fe5a460714bb82a3@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).