From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/13] make dump_emit() use vfs_write() instead of banging at ->f_op->write directly
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:18:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131009011833.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxvNhuXoux88tcYemMWe5Nxdc-srfj3YgBZ7LJ-JaBEdQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:52:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > ... and deal with short writes properly
>
> .. except you don't.
>
> > + while (nr) {
> > + if (dump_interrupted())
> > + return 0;
> > + n = vfs_write(file, addr, nr, &pos);
> > + if (n < 0)
> > + return 0;
> > + file->f_pos = pos;
> > + cprm->written += n;
> > + nr -= n;
> > + }
>
> Please handle 'n == 0' too. Maybe it never happens (ie you get EPIPE
> or ENOSPC), but write returning zero is actually possible and a valid
> return value and traditional for "end of media". Looping forever is
> not a good idea.
Point, but I would argue that we should yell very loud if we get 0 from
vfs_write() for non-zero size. I'm not sure if POSIX allows write(2)
to return that, but a lot of userland code won't be expecting that and
won't be able to cope...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-09 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-09 0:15 [RFC][PATCH 10/13] make dump_emit() use vfs_write() instead of banging at ->f_op->write directly Al Viro
2013-10-09 0:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-09 1:18 ` Al Viro [this message]
2013-10-09 1:20 ` Al Viro
2013-10-09 1:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-09 2:06 ` Al Viro
2013-10-09 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131009011833.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).