Re: [PATCH] aio: clean up aio ring in the fail path

[Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>]

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:19:06PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> Clean up the aio ring file in the fail path of aio_setup_ring
> and ioctx_alloc. And maybe it can fix the GPF issue reported by
> Dave Jones:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/898

Good catch.  I've applied this to my aio-next tree.  It does indeed look 
like it could be the cause of Dave's GPF -- I'll try to trigger it with 
some other kernel debug options on and see if the EAGAIN failure case can 
trip it up.

		-ben

> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/aio.c |    8 ++++++--
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index 08159ed..6efb7f6 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -367,8 +367,10 @@ static int aio_setup_ring(struct kioctx *ctx)
>  	if (nr_pages > AIO_RING_PAGES) {
>  		ctx->ring_pages = kcalloc(nr_pages, sizeof(struct page *),
>  					  GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!ctx->ring_pages)
> +		if (!ctx->ring_pages) {
> +			put_aio_ring_file(ctx);
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	ctx->mmap_size = nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> @@ -645,7 +647,7 @@ static struct kioctx *ioctx_alloc(unsigned nr_events)
>  	    aio_nr + nr_events < aio_nr) {
>  		spin_unlock(&aio_nr_lock);
>  		err = -EAGAIN;
> -		goto err;
> +		goto err_ctx;
>  	}
>  	aio_nr += ctx->max_reqs;
>  	spin_unlock(&aio_nr_lock);
> @@ -662,6 +664,8 @@ static struct kioctx *ioctx_alloc(unsigned nr_events)
>  
>  err_cleanup:
>  	aio_nr_sub(ctx->max_reqs);
> +err_ctx:
> +	aio_free_ring(ctx);
>  err:
>  	free_percpu(ctx->cpu);
>  	free_percpu(ctx->reqs.pcpu_count);
> -- 
> 1.7.7
> 

-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>