From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Sleep: Freeze filesystems during system suspend/hibernation Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:31:52 +1100 Message-ID: <20131217233152.GC20579@dastard> References: <201201281445.49377.rjw@sisk.pl> <201202172159.15396.rjw@sisk.pl> <201205252113.50900.rjw@sisk.pl> <20131217230843.GA2911@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Josh Boyer , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , LKML , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Nigel Cunningham , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" To: Pavel Machek Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131217230843.GA2911@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:08:43AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > >>> Did this patch ever wind up going anywhere? Fedora has it sitting in > > >>> our tree with a comment that says "rebase" and I don't see it in the > > >>> linux-next tree at all. > > >>> > > >>> Did if fall through the cracks or was it NAKed somewhere? > > >> > > >> No, it wasn't in principle. There were some comments I haven't addressed yet. > > > > > > Dredging up a really old thread, sorry. > > > > > > We're still carrying this patch along in Fedora. Should we drop it at > > > this point, or is it still eventually going to head upstream? > > I'd say drop. I disagree - given the problem it is resolving leads to silent filesystem corruption, this patch should be considered somewhat of a priority to push... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com