linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] reiserfs:Adding tmpfile support
@ 2013-12-25 13:23 Fabian Frederick
  2013-12-25 13:39 ` Richard Weinberger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Frederick @ 2013-12-25 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, akpm, viro, jeffm, jack

This patch is largely based on reiserfs_create function.
-Removing dquot_initialize (cf ext2/tmpfile)
-Removing add_entry code.
-Adding d_tmpfile generic call.

It was not extensively tested; other solutions would
be to work with hidden entries or merge
creation - tmpfile process.

Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
---
 fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
index dc5236f..125060b 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
@@ -637,6 +637,65 @@ static int reiserfs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mod
 	return retval;
 }
 
+
+/* tmpfile function based on reiserfs_create without filename entry
+*/
+
+static int reiserfs_tmpfile(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
+	umode_t mode)
+{
+	int retval;
+	struct inode *inode;
+	int jbegin_count =
+	    JOURNAL_PER_BALANCE_CNT * 2 +
+	    2 * (REISERFS_QUOTA_INIT_BLOCKS(dir->i_sb) +
+		 REISERFS_QUOTA_TRANS_BLOCKS(dir->i_sb));
+	struct reiserfs_transaction_handle th;
+	struct reiserfs_security_handle security;
+
+	inode = new_inode(dir->i_sb);
+	if (!inode)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	new_inode_init(inode, dir, mode);
+
+	jbegin_count += reiserfs_cache_default_acl(dir);
+	retval = reiserfs_security_init(dir, inode, &dentry->d_name, &security);
+	if (retval < 0) {
+		drop_new_inode(inode);
+		return retval;
+	}
+	jbegin_count += retval;
+	reiserfs_write_lock(dir->i_sb);
+
+	retval = journal_begin(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
+	if (retval) {
+		drop_new_inode(inode);
+		goto out_failed;
+	}
+
+	retval =
+	    reiserfs_new_inode(&th, dir, mode, NULL, 0 /*i_size */ , dentry,
+			       inode, &security);
+	if (retval)
+		goto out_failed;
+
+	inode->i_op = &reiserfs_file_inode_operations;
+	inode->i_fop = &reiserfs_file_operations;
+	inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &reiserfs_address_space_operations;
+
+	reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(inode);
+	reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(dir);
+
+	unlock_new_inode(inode);
+	d_tmpfile(dentry, inode);
+	retval = journal_end(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
+
+      out_failed:
+	reiserfs_write_unlock(dir->i_sb);
+	return retval;
+}
+
 static int reiserfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
 			  dev_t rdev)
 {
@@ -1522,6 +1581,7 @@ const struct inode_operations reiserfs_dir_inode_operations = {
 	.removexattr = reiserfs_removexattr,
 	.permission = reiserfs_permission,
 	.get_acl = reiserfs_get_acl,
+	.tmpfile = reiserfs_tmpfile,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
1.8.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] reiserfs:Adding tmpfile support
  2013-12-25 13:23 [PATCH 1/1] reiserfs:Adding tmpfile support Fabian Frederick
@ 2013-12-25 13:39 ` Richard Weinberger
  2013-12-26  9:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2013-12-25 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fabian Frederick
  Cc: LKML, linux-fsdevel, Andrew Morton, Al Viro, Jeff Mahoney,
	Jan Kara

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> wrote:
> This patch is largely based on reiserfs_create function.
> -Removing dquot_initialize (cf ext2/tmpfile)
> -Removing add_entry code.
> -Adding d_tmpfile generic call.
>
> It was not extensively tested; other solutions would
> be to work with hidden entries or merge
> creation - tmpfile process.

Is it worth adding new features to a legacy file system like reiserfs?

> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
> ---
>  fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
> index dc5236f..125060b 100644
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
> @@ -637,6 +637,65 @@ static int reiserfs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mod
>         return retval;
>  }
>
> +
> +/* tmpfile function based on reiserfs_create without filename entry
> +*/
> +
> +static int reiserfs_tmpfile(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> +       umode_t mode)
> +{
> +       int retval;
> +       struct inode *inode;
> +       int jbegin_count =
> +           JOURNAL_PER_BALANCE_CNT * 2 +
> +           2 * (REISERFS_QUOTA_INIT_BLOCKS(dir->i_sb) +
> +                REISERFS_QUOTA_TRANS_BLOCKS(dir->i_sb));
> +       struct reiserfs_transaction_handle th;
> +       struct reiserfs_security_handle security;
> +
> +       inode = new_inode(dir->i_sb);
> +       if (!inode)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       new_inode_init(inode, dir, mode);
> +
> +       jbegin_count += reiserfs_cache_default_acl(dir);
> +       retval = reiserfs_security_init(dir, inode, &dentry->d_name, &security);
> +       if (retval < 0) {
> +               drop_new_inode(inode);
> +               return retval;
> +       }
> +       jbegin_count += retval;
> +       reiserfs_write_lock(dir->i_sb);
> +
> +       retval = journal_begin(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
> +       if (retval) {
> +               drop_new_inode(inode);
> +               goto out_failed;
> +       }
> +
> +       retval =
> +           reiserfs_new_inode(&th, dir, mode, NULL, 0 /*i_size */ , dentry,
> +                              inode, &security);
> +       if (retval)
> +               goto out_failed;
> +
> +       inode->i_op = &reiserfs_file_inode_operations;
> +       inode->i_fop = &reiserfs_file_operations;
> +       inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &reiserfs_address_space_operations;
> +
> +       reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(inode);
> +       reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(dir);
> +
> +       unlock_new_inode(inode);
> +       d_tmpfile(dentry, inode);
> +       retval = journal_end(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
> +
> +      out_failed:
> +       reiserfs_write_unlock(dir->i_sb);
> +       return retval;
> +}
> +
>  static int reiserfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
>                           dev_t rdev)
>  {
> @@ -1522,6 +1581,7 @@ const struct inode_operations reiserfs_dir_inode_operations = {
>         .removexattr = reiserfs_removexattr,
>         .permission = reiserfs_permission,
>         .get_acl = reiserfs_get_acl,
> +       .tmpfile = reiserfs_tmpfile,
>  };
>
>  /*
> --
> 1.8.1.4
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



-- 
Thanks,
//richard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] reiserfs:Adding tmpfile support
  2013-12-25 13:39 ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2013-12-26  9:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2013-12-26  9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Weinberger
  Cc: Fabian Frederick, LKML, linux-fsdevel, Andrew Morton, Al Viro,
	Jeff Mahoney, Jan Kara

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 02:39:48PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> wrote:
> > This patch is largely based on reiserfs_create function.
> > -Removing dquot_initialize (cf ext2/tmpfile)
> > -Removing add_entry code.
> > -Adding d_tmpfile generic call.
> >
> > It was not extensively tested; other solutions would
> > be to work with hidden entries or merge
> > creation - tmpfile process.
> 
> Is it worth adding new features to a legacy file system like reiserfs?

Having user API parity is always a good thing, especially if it doesn't
require on-disk format changes.  Same case as FIEMAP or
SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE to mention some recent features.

That being said this needs to follow them model of ext3/ext3/xfs and
add the inode to the unlink/orphan inode list on tmpfile creation and
move it out on flink.

We'll also need a proper verifier for the expected behaviour, which I
hope we'll get out of the work in progress XFS support.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-26  9:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-25 13:23 [PATCH 1/1] reiserfs:Adding tmpfile support Fabian Frederick
2013-12-25 13:39 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-12-26  9:02   ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).