From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs - fix fix symlinks arent checked for expiry Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:42:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20131226134253.5f4b2f02a00e11b8de49770e@linux-foundation.org> References: <20131224094459.20051.4889.stgit@perseus.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel , autofs mailing list , Kernel Mailing List To: Ian Kent Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131224094459.20051.4889.stgit@perseus.fritz.box> Sender: autofs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:44:59 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > When following a symlink the last_used counter is unconditionally > updated causing the expire checks from user space to prevent > expiry. Opps! A bit unclear. You're saying that userspace's act of checking expiry status will itself disrupt the expiry process? Also, it's rather unclear what the userspace impact is here, and how severe it is. Please always carefully describe the user-visible impact so that others can decide which kernel version(s) need the patch. > --- a/fs/autofs4/symlink.c > +++ b/fs/autofs4/symlink.c > @@ -14,8 +14,9 @@ > > static void *autofs4_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) > { > + struct autofs_sb_info *sbi = autofs4_sbi(dentry->d_sb); > struct autofs_info *ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(dentry); > - if (ino) > + if (ino && !autofs4_oz_mode(sbi)) > ino->last_used = jiffies; > nd_set_link(nd, dentry->d_inode->i_private); > return NULL; What kernel is this against? 3.13-rc5 is quite different: static void *autofs4_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) { nd_set_link(nd, dentry->d_inode->i_private); return NULL; }