From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: [LSF/MM][ATTEND] Block IO cgroups and block layer in general
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:15:58 -0500
Message-ID: <20140117151558.GA31716@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18802 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750974AbaAQPQC (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:16:02 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hi,

I want to attend LSF/MM this year. I don't have a prominent agenda as
such. I am more interested in listening to what's happening in some of
the areas like block IO cgroups, persistent memory and block layer in
general.

I have not done much development in block IO cgroups area off late. I am
curious to know what's happening now w.r.t buffered IO support and should
we do something about implementing a separate proportional IO control
outside CFQ to support faster devices and bio based targets.

Thanks
Vivek