From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix posix ACL hooks Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:42:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20140203214258.GB10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1391013467-7598-1-git-send-email-ilya.dryomov@inktank.com> <20140130075421.GA10050@infradead.org> <20140203102943.GF11829@infradead.org> <20140203211955.GY10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20140203212447.GA4843@infradead.org> <20140203213153.GZ10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ilya Dryomov , Sage Weil , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel , Guangliang Zhao , zheng.z.yan@intel.com To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 01:37:03PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > > > Yes, and...? CIFS also doesn't have hardlinks, so _there_ d_find_alias() > > is just fine. > > Hmm? I'm pretty sure cifs can actually have hardlinks. *UGH* How the hell does it... Oh, right - samba on Unix server. I really wonder how well do Windows clients deal with those... Crap... I reall hate that prototype change ;-/