From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix posix ACL hooks Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:43:54 +0000 Message-ID: <20140203214354.GC10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1391013467-7598-1-git-send-email-ilya.dryomov@inktank.com> <20140130075421.GA10050@infradead.org> <20140203102943.GF11829@infradead.org> <20140203211955.GY10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20140203213926.GA10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ilya Dryomov , Sage Weil , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel , Guangliang Zhao , Li Wang , zheng.z.yan@intel.com To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140203213926.GA10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:39:26PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > Which fs are you talking about? For 9P it *is* a function of inode alone. > For CIFS there's no wrong dentry to pick - it doesn't have links to start > with. Except that apparently it does ;-/ Bugger...