From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] support appending AIO writes
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:29:01 +1100
Message-ID: <20140204222901.GE13997@dastard>
References: <20140204172402.380571745@bombadil.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Meirovich <rathamahata@gmail.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Return-path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140204172402.380571745@bombadil.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 09:24:02AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> At least XFS can support appending AIO writes easily, and Sergey has
> demonstrated a use case for them.
> 
> I've not done any performance testing myself, but ensured that xfstests
> already exercises the code path.

The patches look sane. Does the dio change conflict with the
work Al is doing right now of the direct IO path, or will
marshalling that part of the change through the XFS tree be fine?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs