From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] support appending AIO writes Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:59:48 +1100 Message-ID: <20140205075948.GA13647@dastard> References: <20140204172402.380571745@bombadil.infradead.org> <20140204222901.GE13997@dastard> <20140205065728.GA30899@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Meirovich , xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]:26404 "EHLO ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751155AbaBEIAA (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 03:00:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140205065728.GA30899@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:57:28PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:29:01AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > The patches look sane. Does the dio change conflict with the > > work Al is doing right now of the direct IO path, or will > > marshalling that part of the change through the XFS tree be fine? > > I've not seen any changes in that area in Al's trees. That being said > I don't think this little flag should cause any major problems as we'll > have to pass the flags argument in some form of direct I/O method for > all the other quirks we have. Fair enough. I'll run some tests tomorrow on it and go from there. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com