From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: find_fh_dentry returned a DISCONNECTED directory
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:38:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140214153833.GF21982@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FE32A0.9070505@fb.com>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:13:36AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 02/13/2014 10:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:45:16PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:
> >>
> >>> Yesterday you passed on a report of this printk from nfsdfh.c
> >>> firing:
> >>>
> >>> printk("nfsd: find_fh_dentry returned a DISCONNECTED directory:
> >>> %pd2\n", dentry);
> >>>
> >>> I think the dentry probably comes from the FILEID_ROOT case
> >>> of:
> >>>
> >>> if (fileid_type == FILEID_ROOT) dentry =
> >>> dget(exp->ex_path.dentry); else { dentry =
> >>> exportfs_decode_fh(exp->ex_path.mnt, fid, data_left,
> >>> fileid_type, nfsd_acceptable, exp); }
> >>>
> >>> In that case the dentry was found using ordinary filesystem
> >>> lookups, so doesn't go through the same DISCONNECTED-clearing
> >>> logic as in the case of lookups by filehandle.
> >>>
> >>> Probably they have an export root that's not a filesystem root,
> >>> and the lookups happened in the right order?
> >>>
> >>> I suspect that's fine, and that the printk is just stupid, but
> >>> maybe we should clear DISCONNECTED when possible on normal
> >>> lookups. The following is my attempt, though I'm not sure if
> >>> d_alloc is the right place to do this. In any case it might
> >>> help confirm this is what's happening.
> >>>
> >>> So if you pass along this patch to the person who was seeing
> >>> that printk I'd be interested in the results.
> >>
> >> I have been reading through the dentry code for other reasons and
> >> your patch definitely won't change anything. __d_alloc sets
> >> d_flags = 0. Therefore d_alloc always returns with d_flags == 0.
> >
> > You're right, of course. I wasn't thinking straight.
> >
> > So the only dentries with DISCONNECTED set are those created with
> > d_obtain_alias, which is normally only used when you're looking up
> > by filehandle.
> >
> > Except btrfs has a weird use in get_default_root(). So maybe they
> > were running into the dentry that created?
> >
> > So btrfs should probably be using something else, I'm not sure
> > what.
> >
>
> Course now that I look at it I'm not sure what to do. We know the
> location of the inode we want to use as our root dentry, but we could
> already have a dentry for this in cache which is why we use
> d_obtain_alias().
That's exactly the sort of situation that d_obtain_alias() is meant to
help you with.
It's just that you don't want DCACHE_DISCONNECTED set. I'm not even
sure if that causes any actual bug, but it seems confusing at least.
Maybe it would be worth making a d_obtain_alias_for_root() or something
for yours and nfs's use.
--b.
> If we use d_make_root() and then wander into the
> directory later we end up with inodes left over. So should we just
> build a path to the location and do the path lookup stuff so we have a
> valid dentry? Thanks,
>
> Josef
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS/jKfAAoJEANb+wAKly3B1q4P/1wgkd/w6QI6A3c40Qw5Oyfk
> gTOFcSrCnGpd59wOzCu3B8fKuVygBweJ0vwYMlnNgGjCzqidTt37LCD+rRb1iz0w
> BZVSvWS5v8qeaW+qQJJSQH83NX8v+L6zc/5D1stwPIfctXf0WvSijmacV2/BGRgJ
> PqZVXd4yQhd24cqonXUzqNswiFOmPUPs8xrSz3NaR4GcRFVMLuRuubpf/pWkotmI
> mldm8p+SCrDiQHgXEYYHKW1rHKjxKU4GIc9+Dsx0Jjnv26ITiooM8pY2tWW8w98S
> CQv54VQGzzAmyNHQxmv/3sxPg9K4CL+8t7Z4nLQ043K9U9itd+YU/v/vvnzAXvob
> KX5amGZc0cWyYHu9e/9i4HXOJmrmEUdwl5megeI47V/LStzkRUggeha+tRzm4xQW
> +nT4dpueUK1ezDDPvJdOF9id9WNWaGwxKqg6Mqj9+tsnmOwYll2zaNuoOVUZacWY
> Qmv+1JS6gdE8/qLTVjp9I4nTdGN9Cr/sE1EwBVM/GFbCQzAxe4m4uKnXtJ28+Noo
> LOg/u27GSssO6oUFA8Mj6dnTEOKtm5QOMDD+4lxRSyWuAHCOvNg6I4SRykHb1o1I
> OexIp6DK1Siofj6mAFGG5AZunXYH8uR8aOH4Ctva04vC1D6TlZsI5ycgE6V51NUk
> Rv4ICvuwjuu3nZRLLKve
> =KK7m
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-13 21:27 find_fh_dentry returned a DISCONNECTED directory J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-13 23:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 3:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 4:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 14:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 15:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 16:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 16:38 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-14 16:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 17:02 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-14 17:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 17:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 17:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 22:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 22:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 14:17 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-14 15:13 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-14 15:38 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140214153833.GF21982@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).