From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"majianpeng" <majianpeng@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md / procfs: avoid Oops if md-mod removed while /proc/mdstat is being polled.
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:34:43 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140228083443.64c92382@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140227125807.d034c50c7fe2e1a9f3c38ec1@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1317 bytes --]
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:58:07 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:24:45 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > If poll or select is waiting on /proc/mdstat when md-mod is unloaded
> > an oops will ensure when the poll/select completes.
> >
> > This is because the wait_queue_head which is registered with poll_wait()
> > is local to the module and no longer exists when the poll completes and
> > detaches that wait_queue_head (in poll_free_wait -> remove_wait_queue).
> >
> > To fix this we need the wait_queue_head to have (at least) the same life
> > time as the proc_dir_entry. So this patch places it in that structure.
> >
> > We:
> > - add pde_poll_wait to struct proc_dir_entry
> > - call poll_wait() passing this when poll() is called on the proc file
> > - export a function proc_wake_up which will call wake_up() on pde_poll_wait
> >
> > and make use of all that in md.c
>
> This sounds wrong. If a userspace process is waiting on
> md_event_waiters then the md module is "busy" and the rmmod attempt
> should fail?
Al Viro says "no" quite firmly.
I think the core argument is that
rmmod md-mod < /proc/mdstat
would deadlock.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133024267507384
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 6:24 [PATCH] md / procfs: avoid Oops if md-mod removed while /proc/mdstat is being polled NeilBrown
2014-02-27 20:58 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-27 21:34 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-02-27 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-27 23:07 ` NeilBrown
2014-02-27 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-03 3:53 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140228083443.64c92382@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majianpeng@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).