From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: Tracking actual disk write sources instead of flush thread Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20140423230042.GB23206@thunk.org> References: <534DE477.5080904@ubuntu.com> <20140416140147.GA15429@linux.intel.com> <534E9E9D.5030600@ubuntu.com> <4C30833E5CDF444D84D942543DF65BDA625F51A9@G4W3303.americas.hpqcorp.net> <534EC964.6080702@ubuntu.com> <4C30833E5CDF444D84D942543DF65BDA625F5246@G4W3303.americas.hpqcorp.net> <534ED9B8.9090605@ubuntu.com> <20140423134805.GB13050@linux.intel.com> <535816E7.2070106@ubuntu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthew Wilcox , "Zuckerman, Boris" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" To: Phillip Susi Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:57437 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751600AbaDWXAv (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <535816E7.2070106@ubuntu.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:39:19PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: > I'm just a little flabbergasted that this regression ( I'm sure there > was a time when the current io accounting mechanism did work, probably > before the buffer_head -> page cache transition way, *way* back when ) Using what tool? Task-level io accounting is new compared to the buffer -> page cache transition, as far as I can remember. - Ted