linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dcache shrink list corruption?
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:18:51 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140429211851.GA32204@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140429191015.GK18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:10:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 07:16:10PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:03:24PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > 
> > > Introducing a new per-sb lock should be OK.
> > > 
> > > Another idea, which could have subtler effects, is simply not to kill
> > > a dentry that is on the shrink list (indicated by
> > > DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST), since it's bound to get killed anyway.  But
> > > that's a change in behaviour...
> > 
> > Umm...  You mean, if final dput() finds dentry already on shrink list,
> > just leave it there and return?  Might get really painful - the code
> > that knows it's holding the last reference to already unhashed dentry
> > might get a nasty surprise when dput() returns before it's killed off.
> 
> I wonder if we could have dput() side of thinks check if we are on the
> shrink list, mark it "I'll be killing it anyway" and go ahead without
> removal from the shrink list and instead of freeing mark it "I'm done
> with it".  With shrink_dentry_list(), on the other hand, checking for those
> marks, treating the former as "just move it to private list and keep
> going".  After the list of victims is dealt with, keep picking dentries
> from the second list, wait for them to get the second mark and do actual
> freeing.  That ought to avoid any extra locks and preserve all ordering,
> except for that of kmem_cache_free(), AFAICS...
> 
> Comments?

Seems like it would work, but it seems fragile to me - I'm
wondering how we can ensure that the private shrink list
manipulations can be kept private.

We have a similar situation with the inode cache (private shrink
list) but the I_FREEING flag is set the entire time the inode is on
the shrink list. Any new hash lookup or attempt to grab the inode
that occurs while I_FREEING is set fails, so perhaps dentries also
need a well defined "being torn down and freed" state where new
references cannot be taken even though the dentry can still be
found...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-29 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-29 16:01 dcache shrink list corruption? Miklos Szeredi
2014-04-29 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-29 18:03   ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-04-29 18:16     ` Al Viro
2014-04-29 19:10       ` Al Viro
2014-04-29 21:18         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-04-29 21:48           ` Al Viro
2014-04-29 23:04             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-29 23:20               ` Al Viro
2014-04-30  2:31                 ` Al Viro
2014-04-30  2:56                   ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-30  4:04                     ` Al Viro
2014-04-30 15:49                       ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-04-30 15:56                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-04-30 16:03                         ` Al Viro
2014-04-30 17:33                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-04-30 18:36                             ` Al Viro
2014-04-30 18:42                               ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-04-30 19:02                                 ` Al Viro
2014-04-30 19:59                                   ` Al Viro
2014-04-30 20:23                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-30 20:38                                       ` Al Viro
2014-04-30 20:57                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-30 21:12                                           ` Al Viro
2014-04-30 22:12                                             ` Al Viro
2014-04-30 23:04                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-30 23:14                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-30 23:43                                                   ` Al Viro
2014-05-01  0:18                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-01  2:51                                                       ` Al Viro
2014-05-01  2:59                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-01  3:12                                                           ` Al Viro
2014-05-01  9:42                                                             ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-05-01 14:34                                                               ` Al Viro
2014-05-01 21:02                                                                 ` Al Viro
2014-05-01 21:05                                                                   ` Al Viro
2014-05-01 22:52                                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-02  8:43                                                                 ` Szeredi Miklos
2014-05-02 21:04                                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-30 23:38                                                 ` Al Viro
2014-04-30  9:15                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-05-02  5:51                       ` Al Viro
2014-05-02  9:00                         ` Szeredi Miklos
2014-05-02 21:02                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-05-02 21:08                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-05-02 21:18                             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-02 22:40                               ` Al Viro
2014-05-02 23:06                                 ` Al Viro
2014-05-03  4:26                                 ` Al Viro
2014-05-03 18:07                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-03 18:25                                     ` Al Viro
2014-05-03 18:21                                   ` Al Viro
2014-05-04  6:29                                     ` Al Viro
2014-05-06 10:17                                       ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-05-06 14:53                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 16:52                                           ` Al Viro
2014-05-06 17:01                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 19:15                                               ` Al Viro
2014-05-02 22:32                             ` Al Viro
2014-04-29 18:17     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-29 17:56 ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140429211851.GA32204@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).