From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCHED: remove proliferation of wait_on_bit action
 functions.
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 09:42:57 +0200
Message-ID: <20140501074257.GK11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20140501123738.3e64b2d2@notabene.brown>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Return-path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140501123738.3e64b2d2@notabene.brown>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:37:38PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> +static inline int
> +wait_on_bit(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
> +{
> +	if (!test_bit(bit, word))
> +		return 0;
> +	return out_of_line_wait_on_bit(word, bit,
> +				       bit_wait,
> +				       mode & 65535);
> +}

Still puzzled by the 16 bit mask there ;-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>