From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fs/dcache.c - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 22s! [systemd-udevd:1667]
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 06:26:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529052621.GH18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140529051647.GG18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:16:47AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:21:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's an updated patch, hopefully slightly less vomit-inducing.
> >
> > Hmm. Less vomit-inducing, except for this part:
>
> > Ugh, that just *screams* for a helper function. Something like
> >
> > parent = get_parent_and_lock(dentry);
> >
> > or whatever, with that trylock/renamelock dance separated out. The
> > rule would be that it would lock the "dentry", and return the
> > (similarly locked) parent. Or NULL for a root dentry, of course.
> >
> > Please?
>
> Already done in my current tree; see below for the next commit in there...
> I can separate that helper from the rest (dealing with the same livelock
> for dentry_kill(dentry, 1) caller in shrink_dentry_list()). All of that
> is very much subject to reordering, resplitting, writing more decent commit
> messages, etc.
Except that it's from the wrong branch ;-/ Correct one follows:
commit fb860957449c07c6f1a1dd911e83a635b6f11f21
Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu May 29 00:37:49 2014 -0400
deal with "put the parent" side of shrink_dentry_list()
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 6c2a92e..628a791 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -793,30 +793,34 @@ restart:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_prune_aliases);
-static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
+static inline struct dentry *lock_parent(struct dentry *dentry)
{
- struct dentry *dentry, *parent;
+ struct dentry *parent = dentry->d_parent;
+ if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
+ return NULL;
+ if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock))) {
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ read_seqlock_excl(&rename_lock);
+ parent = NULL;
+ if (!IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
+ parent = dentry->d_parent;
+ spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
+ }
+ read_sequnlock_excl(&rename_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ }
+ return parent;
+}
+static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
+{
while (!list_empty(list)) {
struct inode *inode;
- dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
+ struct dentry *dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
+ struct dentry *parent;
- parent = NULL;
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
- if (!IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
- parent = dentry->d_parent;
- if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock))) {
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- parent = NULL;
- read_seqlock_excl(&rename_lock);
- if (!IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
- parent = dentry->d_parent;
- spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
- }
- read_sequnlock_excl(&rename_lock);
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
- }
- }
+ parent = lock_parent(dentry);
/*
* The dispose list is isolated and dentries are not accounted
@@ -864,8 +868,26 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
* fragmentation.
*/
dentry = parent;
- while (dentry && !lockref_put_or_lock(&dentry->d_lockref))
- dentry = dentry_kill(dentry);
+ while (dentry && !lockref_put_or_lock(&dentry->d_lockref)) {
+ parent = lock_parent(dentry);
+ if (dentry->d_lockref.count != 1) {
+ dentry->d_lockref.count--;
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ if (parent)
+ spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+ break;
+ }
+ inode = dentry->d_inode; /* can't be NULL */
+ if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock))) {
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ if (parent)
+ spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+ cpu_relax();
+ continue;
+ }
+ __dentry_kill(dentry);
+ dentry = parent;
+ }
}
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-29 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20140526093741.GA1765@lahna.fi.intel.com>
2014-05-26 13:57 ` fs/dcache.c - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 22s! [systemd-udevd:1667] Al Viro
2014-05-26 14:29 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-26 15:27 ` Al Viro
2014-05-26 16:42 ` Al Viro
2014-05-26 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-26 18:26 ` Al Viro
2014-05-26 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-27 1:40 ` Al Viro
2014-05-27 3:14 ` Al Viro
2014-05-27 4:00 ` Al Viro
2014-05-27 7:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-28 3:19 ` Al Viro
2014-05-28 7:37 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-28 11:57 ` Al Viro
2014-05-28 13:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-28 14:19 ` Al Viro
2014-05-28 18:39 ` Al Viro
2014-05-28 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-28 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-28 20:25 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 10:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-28 20:14 ` Al Viro
2014-05-28 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-28 21:28 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 3:11 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 3:52 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 5:34 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 10:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-29 11:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-29 13:30 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 14:56 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-29 15:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-29 15:44 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 16:23 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 16:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-29 16:53 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 18:52 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-30 4:50 ` Al Viro
2014-05-30 5:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-30 6:49 ` Al Viro
2014-05-30 8:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-30 15:21 ` Al Viro
2014-05-30 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-30 16:48 ` [git pull] " Al Viro
2014-05-30 17:14 ` Al Viro
2014-05-31 14:18 ` Josh Boyer
2014-05-31 14:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-31 14:58 ` Josh Boyer
2014-05-31 16:12 ` Josh Boyer
2014-05-30 17:15 ` Sedat Dilek
2014-05-29 4:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-29 5:16 ` Al Viro
2014-05-29 5:26 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140529052621.GH18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).