From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <daniel@phunq.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] tux3: Use writeback hook to remove duplicated core code
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:30:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140602033047.GT14410@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538B9E58.4000108@phunq.net>
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 02:42:48PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Instead of re-implementing part of fs/fs-writeback.c, use a proposed
> net ->writeback super operation to drive delta writeback. For each
> inode that is cleaned, call inode_writeback_done(inode). For each
> inode that will be kept dirty in cache, call inode_writeback_touch
> so that the inode appears young to fs-writeback and does not trigger
> repeated ->writeback flushes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Phillips <daniel@tux3.org>
I have not looked at the sanity of the tux3 writeback algorithm, so
I'm not commenting on whether it works or not. However, this caught
my eye:
> static void __tux3_clear_dirty_inode(struct inode *inode, unsigned delta)
> {
> struct tux3_inode *tuxnode = tux_inode(inode);
> - tux3_inode_wb_lock(inode);
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> spin_lock(&tuxnode->lock);
> tux3_clear_dirty_inode_nolock(inode, delta, 0);
> spin_unlock(&tuxnode->lock);
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> - tux3_inode_wb_unlock(inode);
> + inode_writeback_done(inode);
> }
I get very worried whenever I see locks inside inode->i_lock. In
general, i_lock is supposed to be the innermost lock that is taken,
and there are very few exceptions to that - the inode LRU list is
one of the few.
I don't know what the tuxnode->lock is, but I found this:
* inode->i_lock
* tuxnode->lock (to protect tuxnode data)
* tuxnode->dirty_inodes_lock (for i_ddc->dirty_inodes,
* Note: timestamp can be updated
* outside inode->i_mutex)
and this:
* inode->i_lock
* tuxnode->lock
* sb->dirty_inodes_lock
Which indicates that you take a filesystem global lock a couple of
layers underneath the VFS per-inode i_lock. I'd suggest you want to
separate the use of the vfs inode ilock from the locking heirarchy
of the tux3 inode....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-02 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-01 21:41 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a super operation for writeback Daniel Phillips
2014-06-01 21:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] tux3: Use writeback hook to remove duplicated core code Daniel Phillips
2014-06-02 3:30 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-06-02 20:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2014-06-02 3:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a super operation for writeback Dave Chinner
2014-06-02 20:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2014-06-03 3:33 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-03 7:01 ` Daniel Phillips
2014-06-03 7:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2014-06-03 7:47 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2014-06-03 8:12 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-03 8:57 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2014-06-03 7:52 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-03 14:05 ` Jan Kara
2014-06-03 14:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-03 14:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-03 15:21 ` Jan Kara
2014-06-03 22:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2014-06-04 20:16 ` Jan Kara
2014-06-02 8:30 ` Christian Stroetmann
2014-06-03 3:39 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-03 5:30 ` Christian Stroetmann
2014-06-03 14:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-03 16:30 ` Christian Stroetmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140602033047.GT14410@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel@phunq.net \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).