linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Geremy Condra <gcondra@google.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Add support for SFITRIM, an ioctl for secure FITRIM.
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:07:03 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140613050703.GT4453@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKP4w2QvVUNp18jnX69eP0hjA-T6zn2sT3TQ-P6zpu-EhXZPAQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:37:58PM -0700, JP Abgrall wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:15:38PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> Indeed, mixing -o discard and SFITRIM is a recipe for
> >> confusion and leakage - "but I used secure trim on the device!" -
> >> and so all discards either have to be secure or not.
> 
> The idea was to keep on not using -o discard. And move from FITRIM to SFITRIM.

IOWs, you want either normal discard or secure discard, and not a
mix of both. IOWs, you don't need SFITRIM, you need a "block device
does secure discard only" configuration flag...

> > Oh, and while I think of it secure discard at the filesystem level
> > isn't even a guarantee that you'll get rid of all stale references
> > to a sector - if the filesystem has freed and then re-allocated a
> > block without having gone through a discard cycle on that block,
> > then the underlying device may have old copies of the block that it
> > hasn't garbage collected and SFITRIM won't clean those up because it
> > won't ask to trim in-use blocks....
> 
> Arg. So, if understand this correctly, if the eMMC chip won't get a
> secure discard/trim of a block that gets reassigned to the FS, then
						      ^^ within

> data duplicates within the eMMC related to that block are not cleared,
> and the next SFITRIM won't even reach that block or the duplicates as
> the FS says they are in use.

Pretty much.

And even using -o discard is no guarantee that the filesystem will
issue a discard between freeing and re-using a block e.g.  XFS
explicitly avoids issuing discards for blocks it re-uses immediately
because they are always considered "in-use" from a transactional
POV. Hence there is no place where the block is considered free, and
hence there isn't a point in time where a discard can be safely
issued on that block.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-13  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1402625647-31439-1-git-send-email-jpa@google.com>
2014-06-13  2:36 ` [PATCH] ext4: Add support for SFITRIM, an ioctl for secure FITRIM Eric Sandeen
2014-06-13  3:02   ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-13  3:12     ` Eric Sandeen
2014-06-13  3:19       ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-13  3:24         ` Eric Sandeen
2014-06-13  4:37           ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-13  3:15   ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-13  3:30     ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-13  4:37       ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-13  5:07         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-06-13 14:20           ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-13 14:31             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-13 19:44               ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-13 19:57                 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-06-13 20:12                   ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-13 23:41                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-14  0:46                   ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-17  2:49                   ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-17 11:27                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-17 11:55                     ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-17 12:46                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-17 13:00                         ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-17 13:54                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-17 17:53                             ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-18  9:33                               ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-18 21:51                                 ` JP Abgrall
2014-06-19  8:10                                   ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-18 22:06                                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-19  0:36                                   ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-19  8:15                                     ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-20  2:44                                       ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-19  8:33                                   ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-17 17:35                           ` JP Abgrall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140613050703.GT4453@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=gcondra@google.com \
    --cc=jpa@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).