From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs.h: Remove unnecessary extern prototypes Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:58:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20140701075802.GA9606@infradead.org> References: <20140630161944.bd57016cba11f47185dbe6c5@linux-foundation.org> <1404171091.2717.24.camel@joe-AO725> <20140630163909.9859f3c55406746129a69e77@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Joe Perches , Al Viro , Jeff Layton , "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140630163909.9859f3c55406746129a69e77@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:39:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I can fix it and resubmit if you like. > > OK. How about we wait for -rc6 or thereabouts? That should minimise > the pain profile. Or just drop it. This is the perfect example for a patch having absolutely no real benefit and introducing a lot of churn. People need to learn that randomly fixing style in code they don't maintain or change in a major way is abosolutely poinless. Help with reviewing newly added code so that it has good style instead.