From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: check bdi->dirty_exceeded when trying to skip data writes Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:54:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20140701225420.6cc94fb5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1403956718-17575-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jaegeuk Kim Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1403956718-17575-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:58:38 +0900 Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > If we don't check the current backing device status, balance_dirty_pages can > fall into infinite pausing routine. > > This can be occurred when a lot of directories make a small number of dirty > dentry pages including files. > > ... > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ bool available_free_memory(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type) > mem_size = (nm_i->nat_cnt * sizeof(struct nat_entry)) >> 12; > res = mem_size < ((val.totalram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 2); > } else if (type == DIRTY_DENTS) { > + if (sbi->sb->s_bdi->dirty_exceeded) > + return false; > mem_size = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS); > res = mem_size < ((val.totalram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1); > } err, filesystems should not be playing around with this. Perhaps VFS changes are needed. Please tell us much much more about what is going on here.