From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow increasing the buffer-head per-CPU LRU size
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 00:46:34 +0200
Message-ID: <20140707224634.GE18735@two.firstfloor.org>
References: <53B667F9.90306@bull.net>
 <87y4w6sbp7.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <53BA772C.6040506@bull.net>
 <20140707163003.GA18735@two.firstfloor.org>
 <20140707152936.a286b0f46ae1b06aa41c1959@linux-foundation.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Sebastien Buisson <sebastien.buisson@bull.net>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140707152936.a286b0f46ae1b06aa41c1959@linux-foundation.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

> Can anyone demonstrate why we shouldn't just do

I was assuming due to memory usage: with 4K blocks 32K->64K

-Andi