From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: new mailing list for union/overlay filesystems?
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20140714.131738.1029964741108412525.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <CAJfpegshQmihBb3xGQOcz3ua_b0v1ce=Xknmg7HzF=HqBe8i5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140625.155459.559484835637033294.davem@davemloft.net>
	<66941674.g6WvxqVh4a@xrated>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, dhowells@redhat.com, hooanon05g@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: hpj@urpla.net
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:35388 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756998AbaGNURk (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:17:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <66941674.g6WvxqVh4a@xrated>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>


Sorry I'm not changing the name, it's extremely inconvenient for all of
the people maintaining archives of this list.

I also do not agree with the degree to which the name not being generic
enough matters, sorry.  So I wouldn't have changed it on that grounds
anyways.