linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: Daniel Poelzleithner <gmane@poelzi.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The VFS hot tracking debacle
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 07:52:48 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140717215248.GD20518@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2831755.nuyKSN0E6B@merkaba>

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:34:49PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014, 19:35:53 schrieb Daniel Poelzleithner:
> > Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > > Ping ^ 7
> > 
> > I'm following this patch now for quite some time and I have to say that this
> > thread+patch is one of the most disappointing experiences I had with kernel
> > development.
> > 
> > I can't understand why such a patch is simply ignored from the maintainers
> > of the subsystem, no comment, no review, no checkin.
> 
> I always wanted to try this one out, but never got around doing it.
> 
> I really like the general approach of it to put the general stuff into VFS and 
> only the special stuff into filesystems like BTRFS.

And that's the core issue here: there are no applications that use
the information.  i.e. it's a solution looking for a problem.

I spent a lot of time reviewing and helping on this, and I made
repeated suggestions that applications like xfs_fsr could make use
of the information to do optimised file layout during
defragmentation, but nothing like that has ever been implemented.

So, really, until there is an application that actually demonstrates
the usefulness of the specific information that is tracked and
exported, we can't verify that the code as it stands is actually
useful. We can verify that the code doesn't have problems, but we
can't verify whether it is fit for purpose because it currently has
no purpose....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-17 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-06 13:45 [PATCH v6 00/11] VFS hot tracking Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] VFS hot tracking: Define basic data structures and functions Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] VFS hot tracking: Track IO and record heat information Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] VFS hot tracking: Add a workqueue to move items between hot maps Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] VFS hot tracking: Add shrinker functionality to curtail memory usage Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] VFS hot tracking: Add an ioctl to get hot tracking information Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] VFS hot tracking: Add a /proc interface to make the interval tunable Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] VFS hot tracking: Add a /proc interface to control memory usage Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-11 22:15   ` Dave Hansen
2013-11-11 22:45     ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-12 17:05       ` Dave Hansen
2013-11-12 20:38         ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-12 21:02           ` Dave Hansen
2013-11-12 21:56             ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-12-11 15:44   ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] VFS hot tracking: Add documentation Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] VFS hot tracking, btrfs: Add hot tracking support Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] VFS hot tracking, xfs: " Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-06 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] MAINTAINERS: add the maintainers for VFS hot tracking Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] " Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-13 18:33 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-21 13:57   ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-30  9:55     ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-12-03 20:16       ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-12-11 15:45 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2014-07-17 19:35   ` The VFS hot tracking debacle Daniel Poelzleithner
2014-07-17 21:34     ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-17 21:52       ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-07-18  8:25         ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-20  0:02           ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-25  8:43             ` Steven Whitehouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140717215248.GD20518@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=gmane@poelzi.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).