From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] fs/proc/task_mmu.c: cleanup the "tail_vma" horror in m_next() Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 21:47:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20140805194703.GA30739@redhat.com> References: <20140805194627.GA30693@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Viro , Cyrill Gorcunov , David Howells , "David S. Miller" , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Peter Zijlstra , Sasha Levin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140805194627.GA30693@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org 1. Kill the first "vma != NULL" check. Firstly this is not possible, m_next() won't be called if ->start() or the previous ->next() returns NULL. And if it was possible the 2nd "vma != tail_vma" check is buggy, we should not wrongly return ->tail_vma. 2. Make this function readable. The logic is very simple, we should return check "vma != tail" once and return "vm_next || tail_vma". Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov --- fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 8 +++----- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c index f1254b4..c4c8825 100644 --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c @@ -209,15 +209,13 @@ out: static void *m_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) { struct proc_maps_private *priv = m->private; - struct vm_area_struct *vma = v; struct vm_area_struct *tail_vma = priv->tail_vma; - struct vm_area_struct *next; + struct vm_area_struct *vma = v, *next = NULL; (*pos)++; - if (vma && (vma != tail_vma) && vma->vm_next) - return vma->vm_next; + if (vma != tail_vma) + next = vma->vm_next ?: tail_vma; - next = (vma != tail_vma)? tail_vma: NULL; if (!next) vma_stop(priv); return next; -- 1.5.5.1