From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] fs/proc/task_mmu.c: shift "priv->task = NULL" from m_start() to m_stop() Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:18:28 +0300 Message-ID: <20140806101828.GC30703@node.dhcp.inet.fi> References: <20140805194627.GA30693@redhat.com> <20140805194707.GA30746@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Cyrill Gorcunov , David Howells , "David S. Miller" , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Peter Zijlstra , Sasha Levin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Oleg Nesterov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140805194707.GA30746@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:47:07PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > 1. There is no reason to reset ->tail_vma in m_start(), if we return > IS_ERR_OR_NULL() it won't be used. > > 2. m_start() also clears priv->task to ensure that m_stop() won't use > the stale pointer if we fail before get_task_struct(). But this is > ugly and confusing, move this initialization in m_stop(). > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov -- Kirill A. Shutemov