linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: rtg.canonical@gmail.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: namespace: suppress 'may be used uninitialized' warnings
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:32:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140828143243.GH18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409234149-3485-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com>

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:55:49AM -0600, rtg.canonical@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> 
> The gcc version 4.9.1 compiler complains even though it isn't possible for
> these variables to not get initialized before they are used.

Sigh...  The root cause of that shite is that copy_mount_string() is too
convoluted for gcc (piss-poor) detection of uninitialized variables.  And
yes, it is somewhat overcomplicated - it returns 0 or -E... *and* in former
case it returns NULL or a string as well, via a char ** argument.

The usual convention for such suckers is "return a pointer, using
ERR_PTR(-E...) to indicate an error".  We have all of 4 (four) callers,
all in fs/*.c (and nobody else could see that function, unless they manually
included fs/internal.h).

So let's turn that into
char *copy_mount_string(const void __user *data)
{
	return data ? strndup_user(data, PAGE_SIZE) : NULL;
}

and uses of that thing into
        kernel_type = copy_mount_string(type);
	ret = PTR_ERR(kernel_type);
        if (IS_ERR(kernel_type))
                goto out_type;
etc.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-28 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-27 19:51 [PATCH 3.17-rc2] fs: namespace: suppress 'may be used uninitialized' warnings rtg.canonical
2014-08-27 21:01 ` Al Viro
2014-08-28 13:55   ` [PATCH v2] " rtg.canonical
2014-08-28 14:32     ` Al Viro [this message]
2014-08-28 17:26       ` [PATCH v3] " rtg.canonical

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140828143243.GH18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rtg.canonical@gmail.com \
    --cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).