From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: ext4 vs btrfs performance on SSD array Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:08:08 -0700 Message-ID: <20140905160808.GA7967@infradead.org> References: <20140902000822.GA20473@dastard> <20140902012222.GA21405@infradead.org> <20140903100158.34916d34@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Nikolai Grigoriev , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jens Axboe To: NeilBrown Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:35054 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbaIEQIN (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:08:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903100158.34916d34@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:01:58AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > Do we still need maximums at all? I don't think we do. At least on any system I work with I have to increase them to get good performance without any adverse effect on throttling. > So can we just remove the limit on max_sectors and the RAID5 stripe cache > size? I'm certainly keen to remove the later and just use a mempool if the > limit isn't needed. > I have seen reports that a very large raid5 stripe cache size can cause > a reduction in performance. I don't know why but I suspect it is a bug that > should be found and fixed. > > Do we need max_sectors ?? I'll send a patch to remove it and watch for the fireworks..