From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: add RWF_NONBLOCK support
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 13:29:52 +0200
Message-ID: <20141002112952.GA32112@lst.de>
References: <1412197494-7655-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1412197494-7655-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20141001222327.GT4758@dastard>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44662 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750987AbaJBL3y (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:29:54 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141001222327.GT4758@dastard>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:23:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Shouldn't that be:
> 
> 		if (type & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL) {
> 			mutex_unlock(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mutex);

Yes, I will resend the fixed version.