public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fs/namei.c: Misuse of sequence counts?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 23:01:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141012040142.GB24463@zzz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141012001259.GM7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 01:12:59AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> Huh?  What's to guarantee that dentry hasn't become negative since the
> moment we'd fetched the seqcount?  _That_ is the problem we are dealing
> with here - link_path_walk() relies on nd->inode being non-NULL.

Hmm, I guess that makes sense.  So the code is actually verifying that the inode
is still the inode that was referenced from the current or root directory when
nd->path was set.  But couldn't the problem also be solved by setting nd->inode
directly in the fs->seq retry loops?  (The file descriptor case could be
'nd->inode = file_inode(f.file);'.)  Then there would be no need for the extra
read_seqcount_retry() just for the inode.  The patch you posted looks correct,
but I wonder if this approach would be better.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-12  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-11 22:58 fs/namei.c: Misuse of sequence counts? Eric Biggers
2014-10-11 23:46 ` Al Viro
2014-10-12  3:55   ` Eric Biggers
2014-10-12  4:29     ` Al Viro
2014-10-12  0:12 ` Al Viro
2014-10-12  4:01   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2014-10-12  4:37     ` Al Viro
2014-10-12  4:51       ` Eric Biggers
2014-10-12  5:08       ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141012040142.GB24463@zzz \
    --to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox