From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] overlay filesystem v25
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:25:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141028232557.GF5718@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141028225512.GD7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:55:13PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:11:27PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 01:12:14AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:36:21AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Code making direct use of smp_read_barrier_depends() is harder to read,
> > > > in my experience, but good point on the sparse noise. Maybe a new
> > > > lockless_dereference() primitive? Maybe something like the following?
> > > > (Untested, probably does not even build.)
> > > >
> > > > #define lockless_dereference(p) \
> > > > ({ \
> > > > typeof(*p) *_________p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
> > > > smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
> > > > _________p1; \
> > > > })
> > >
> > > Hmm... Where would you prefer to put it? rcupdate.h?
> >
> > Good a place as any, I guess. Please see patch below. Left to myself,
> > I would send this along for the next merge window, but please let me
> > know if you would like it sooner.
>
> It's needed sooner, unfortunately. Guys, could you take a look at
> vfs.git#for-linus and comment?
The version in your tree looks good. I will drop my commit in favor
of yours.
The use of lockless_dereference() and smp_mb__before_spinlock() in
d45f00ae43 (overlayfs: barriers for opening upper-layer directory)
looks fine to me. Only nit is lack of space between "=" and
lockless_dereference().
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-28 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-23 23:25 [GIT PULL] overlay filesystem v25 Miklos Szeredi
2014-10-24 2:20 ` Al Viro
2014-10-24 3:24 ` Al Viro
2014-10-24 7:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-10-25 8:18 ` Al Viro
2014-10-25 9:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-10-25 17:06 ` Al Viro
2014-10-27 8:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-10-27 15:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-27 17:28 ` Al Viro
2014-10-27 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 1:12 ` Al Viro
2014-10-28 4:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 22:55 ` Al Viro
2014-10-28 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-10-24 7:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141028232557.GF5718@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).