From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [RFC] dealing with proc_ns_follow_link() and "namespace" dentries Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 15:06:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20141101150620.GP7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20141013062945.GX7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87r3ybwq0b.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20141101083804.GO7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:58012 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758449AbaKAPGY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2014 11:06:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141101083804.GO7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:38:04AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > OK, interim branch (_completely_ untested, and there's quite a bit of > work remaining) is in vfs.git#nsfs. ... except that what got pushed was completely buggered - the last changes not committed *and* include/linux/ns_common.h not git-add'ed at the very beginning. Oh, well - it wasn't hard to reconstruct its history... Anyway, that much got fixed and pushed; sorry about the noise - shouldn't have posted before grabbing some sleep...