From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v3] fs: Remove i_devices from struct inode
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 20:20:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141104202018.GM7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrV3DauoM0x9aiEdKtZLxXqfeEapsWD-t3n_norkX5To7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:14:26PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Yeah, this idea clearly doesn't work. But I wonder whether the
> revised variant (which may be just moving cd_forget and bd_forget from
> evict to iput_final) would work.
How the hell is it better? Neither of those will happen as long as dentry
is retained. And with /dev on tmpfs (which is bloody common) _that_ won't
happen until device node is unlinked...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-04 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-04 10:27 [PATCH 0/4 v3] fs: Remove i_devices from struct inode Jan Kara
2014-11-04 10:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] blockdev: Don't use i_devices inode field Jan Kara
2014-11-04 10:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] chardev: Increment cdev reference count when i_cdev references it Jan Kara
2014-11-04 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] chardev: Don't use i_devices inode field Jan Kara
2014-11-04 10:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] fs: Remove i_devices list head Jan Kara
2014-11-04 15:39 ` [PATCH 0/4 v3] fs: Remove i_devices from struct inode Al Viro
2014-11-04 19:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-04 19:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-04 20:16 ` Al Viro
2014-11-04 20:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-04 19:55 ` Jan Kara
2014-11-04 20:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-04 20:20 ` Al Viro [this message]
2014-11-04 20:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141104202018.GM7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).