From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH-v4 1/7] vfs: split update_time() into update_time() and write_time() Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 07:28:46 -0800 Message-ID: <20141127152846.GA24779@infradead.org> References: <1416997437-26092-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1416997437-26092-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <20141126192328.GA20436@infradead.org> <20141127144116.GA14091@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linux Filesystem Development List , Ext4 Developers List , Linux btrfs Developers List , XFS Developers To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141127144116.GA14091@thunk.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org FYI, I suspect for now the best might be to let filesystems that define ->update_times work as-is and not tie them into the infrastructure. At least for XFS I suspect the lazy updates might better be handled internally, although I'm not entirely sure yet. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs