From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC]: Btrfs: Decoupling block-size and
 page-size in BTRFS.
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 02:13:53 -0800
Message-ID: <20141201101353.GA763@infradead.org>
References: <4053596.iiH0KJPrOm@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:60837 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752822AbaLAKNz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 05:13:55 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4053596.iiH0KJPrOm@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Is this topic relevant for the broarder FS community?  Maybe the btrfs
community should look into organizing a meeting co-hosted with Vault
similar to what we did for ext4 and XFS in the past?