linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Filesystem Development List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux btrfs Developers List <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	XFS Developers <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v4 1/7] vfs: split update_time() into update_time() and write_time()
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:04:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141201150450.GA3337@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141201092810.GA5538@infradead.org>

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:28:10AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> The ->is_readonly method seems like a clear winner to me, I'm all for
> adding it, and thus suggested moving it first in the series.

It's a real winner for me as well, but the reason why I dropped it is
because if btrfs() has to keep its ->update_time function, we wouldn't
actually have a user for is_readonly().  I suppose we could have
update_time() call ->is_readonly() and then ->update_time() if they
exist, but it only seemed to add an extra call and a bit of extra
overhead without really simplifying things for btrfs.

If there were other users of ->is_readonly, then it would make sense,
but it seemed better to move into a separate code refactoring series.

> I've read a bit more through the series and would like to suggest
> the following approach for the rest:
> 
>  - convert ext3/4 to use ->update_time instead of the ->dirty_time
>    callout so it gets and exact notifications (preferably the few
>    remaining filesystems as well, although that shouldn't really be a
>    blocker)

We could do that, although ext3/4's ->update_time() would be exactly
the same as the generic update_time() function, so there would be code
duplication.  If the goal is to get rid of the magic in
-->dirty_inode() being used to work around how the VFS makes changes
to fields that end up in the on-disk inode, we would need to audit a
lot of extra code paths; at the very least, in how the generic quota
code handles updates to i_size and i_blocks (for example).

And BTW, we don't actually have a dirty_time() function any more in
the current patch series.  update_time() is currently looking like
this:

static int update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time, int flags)
{
	if (inode->i_op->update_time)
		return inode->i_op->update_time(inode, time, flags);

	if (flags & S_ATIME)
		inode->i_atime = *time;
	if (flags & S_VERSION)
		inode_inc_iversion(inode);
	if (flags & S_CTIME)
		inode->i_ctime = *time;
	if (flags & S_MTIME)
		inode->i_mtime = *time;

	if ((inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_LAZYTIME) && !(flags & S_VERSION) &&
	    !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
		__mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_TIME);
	else
		__mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC);
	return 0;
}

>  - Convert xfs, btrfs and the remaining filesystes using ->dirty_inode
>    incrementally.

Right, so xfs and btrfs (which are the two file systems that have
update_time at the moment) can just drop update_time() and then check
the ->dirty_time() for (flags & I_DIRTY_TIME).  Hmm, I suspect this
might be better for xfs, yes?

	if ((inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_LAZYTIME) && !(flags & S_VERSION) &&
	    !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
		__mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_TIME);
	else
		__mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_TIME);

XFS doesn't have a ->dirty_time yet, but that way XFS would be able to
use the I_DIRTY_TIME flag to log the journal timestamps if it so
desires, and perhaps drop the need for it to use update_time().  (And
with XFS doing logical journalling, it may be that you might want to
include the timestamp update in the journal if you have a journal
transaction open already, so the disk is spun up or likely to be spin
up anyway, right?)

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-01 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-26 10:23 [PATCH-v4 0/7] add support for a lazytime mount option Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 10:23 ` [PATCH-v4 1/7] vfs: split update_time() into update_time() and write_time() Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 19:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-27 12:34     ` Jan Kara
2014-11-27 15:25       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-27 14:41     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-27 15:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-27 15:33       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-27 16:49         ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-27 20:27           ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-12-01  9:28             ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-01 15:04               ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-12-01 17:18                 ` David Sterba
2014-12-02  9:20                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-02 15:09                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 10:23 ` [PATCH-v4 2/7] vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-27 13:14   ` Jan Kara
2014-11-27 20:19     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-28 12:41       ` Jan Kara
2014-11-27 23:00     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-28  5:36       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-28 16:24       ` Jan Kara
2014-11-26 10:23 ` [PATCH-v4 3/7] vfs: don't let the dirty time inodes get more than a day stale Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 10:23 ` [PATCH-v4 4/7] vfs: add lazytime tracepoints for better debugging Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 10:23 ` [PATCH-v4 5/7] vfs: add find_active_inode_nowait() function Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 10:23 ` [PATCH-v4 6/7] ext4: add support for a lazytime mount option Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 19:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-26 22:48   ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-26 23:10     ` Andreas Dilger
2014-11-26 23:35       ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-27 13:27         ` Jan Kara
2014-11-27 13:32           ` Jan Kara
2014-11-27 15:25             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-27 15:41               ` Jan Kara
2014-11-27 20:13                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 10:23 ` [PATCH-v4 7/7] btrfs: add an is_readonly() so btrfs can use common code for update_time() Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141201150450.GA3337@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).