From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mnt: Fix a memory stomp in umount
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:01:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141218200110.GO22149@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d27gkia8.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:57:19AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> While reviewing the code of umount_tree I realized that when we append
> to a preexisting unmounted list we do not change pprev of the former
> first item in the list.
>
> Which means later in namespace_unlock hlist_del_init(&mnt->mnt_hash) on
> the former first item of the list will stomp unmounted.first leaving
> it set to some random mount point which we are likely to free soon.
>
> This isn't likely to hit, but if it does I don't know how anyone could
> track it down.
All you need for that kind of loop to work is correct -next on all elements.
Seriously. Even correct first->pprev is not needed. Look:
struct hlist_head head = unmounted;
if (likely(hlist_empty(&head))) // no dereferences of ppre *or* next
sod off
head.first->pprev = &head.first; // pprev of the first is valid now
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&unmounted);
hlist_for_each_entry(mnt, &head, mnt_hash)
if (mnt->mnt_ex_mountpoint.mnt)
mntget(mnt->mnt_ex_mountpoint.mnt);
// only needed ->next for that loop
...
while (!hlist_empty(&head)) {
mnt = hlist_entry(head.first, struct mount, mnt_hash);
hlist_del_init(&mnt->mnt_hash);
...
}
Now, we certainly need pprev of the first to be correct for hlist_del_init()
to work. What we do not need is correctness of pprev of the second as we
call hlist_del_init(). And _after_ hlist_del_init() pprev of what used to
be the second (the first, now) is healed.
So we actually are OK here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-18 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-18 16:57 [PATCH] mnt: Fix a memory stomp in umount Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <CA+55aFz6grtss0SXqOizXMOOF4sxT3FC4GC4NCiMF2Huy1vE4A@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-18 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-12-18 19:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-12-18 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-12-18 21:05 ` Al Viro
2014-12-18 21:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-12-19 0:02 ` Al Viro
2014-12-19 0:03 ` Al Viro
2015-01-02 21:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-01-02 21:13 ` Al Viro
2015-01-02 21:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-12-18 20:01 ` Al Viro [this message]
2014-12-18 20:15 ` Al Viro
2014-12-18 20:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141218200110.GO22149@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox