From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 04:24:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150108122448.GA18034@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420669543-8093-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
> This patchset passes xfstests and various benchmarks and stress
> workloads, so the real question is now:
>
> What have I missed?
>
> Comments, thoughts, flames?
Why is this done in XFS and not in generic code?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-08 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 22:25 [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion Dave Chinner
2015-01-07 22:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] xfs: introduce mmap/truncate lock Dave Chinner
2015-01-22 13:09 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-22 21:30 ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-07 22:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] xfs: use i_mmaplock on read faults Dave Chinner
2015-01-07 22:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] xfs: use i_mmaplock on write faults Dave Chinner
2015-01-07 22:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] xfs: take i_mmap_lock on extent manipulation operations Dave Chinner
2015-01-22 13:23 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-22 21:32 ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-07 22:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] xfs: xfs_setattr_size no longer races with page faults Dave Chinner
2015-01-07 22:25 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] xfs: lock out page faults from extent swap operations Dave Chinner
2015-01-22 13:41 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-08 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion Jan Kara
2015-01-08 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-01-08 21:45 ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-12 17:42 ` Jan Kara
2015-01-21 22:26 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150108122448.GA18034@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).